Of course, workflows and methods can be very personal. Basically, I have done this as a thinly disguised "new feature request" to the ACDSee team. I was quite happy until Nikon decided to decapitate the NX2 products into a SilkyPix workflow.Īfter significant work, I have decided to write a post about the "External Editors" I use with ACDSee and why I use them. FWIW, my previous workflow used Nikon Capture NX-2 /ViewNX2 + NIK Collection. I committed my library of 150,000 images to ACDSee about 4 months ago. Thus after much research of LR, DXO, RT, PSP, and probably 15 other applications. (Comparable to GIMP/UFRAW at many levels) I have no desire to move a tree or change the sky. The only feature that seems truly unique is content aware and the workflow. Used mostly for content aware, moving objects, and changing backgrounds. ![]() * Photoshop / ACR / Bridge - industry gold standard bit level editor and RAW converter. * Lightroom and operation over a network. Why? Because of the crappy way that LR seems to want to work with combined network and local files. So it seems difficult to decide against that workflow, but I decided long ago to do so anyway. It is well known the Adobe suite is the perceived gold standard for photography.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |