![]() We use Speedmark to test everything from Mac minis to Mac Pros. In fact, the eight-core processor was just 4 percent faster than the quad-core 3GHz Mac Pro in our Speedmark overall system benchmark. In the bulk of our testing, in which tasks were performed one at a time, doubling the processors didn’t make much of a difference. ![]() The problem with this multicore strategy is that throwing more processors at a job doesn’t always mean that the task will finish faster.īy using the same configuration on both machines, it is easy to see where and how the different processors impact performance. The new eight-core Mac Pro uses two 3GHz quad-core Intel Xeon processors. In fact, every Mac in Apple’s current product line is using at least dual-core Intel processors-the rest of the Mac Pro processor options feature two dual-core processors running at 2GHz, 2.66GHz, or 3GHz. While it’s true that processor speeds continue to make modest gains, these days most manufacturers are touting multiple processors on their chips, a change from the past, when processor vendors enjoyed frequent, remarkable leaps in individual processor speeds. Our testing, however, shows that most people would be served just as well by a less-expensive For software programmers eager to help their applications take advantage of multicore systems, or for Mac users who regularly spend hours compressing video or rendering 3-D scenes, purchasing the eight-core Mac Pro makes sense. Apple’s professional tower, the highly configurable Mac Pro, recently added another choice that features eight processing cores, all running at 3GHz. Many hotshots look straight to the top of the line when shopping for a new Mac. Power-hungry computer pros are always looking for tools to speed up time-consuming tasks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |